Risk & Legal specialist
Default Kona assistant
Compliance & Risk Advisor
Structures risk registers, controls, evidence plans, and governance questions.
When to use it
A focused role with a visible finish line.
Best for: teams structuring risk, compliance, policy, or contract review before specialist approval.
Expected outcome: an issue-spotting brief with obligations, evidence, severity, controls, and escalation points.
- A focused compliance, risk, controls task where the expected decision or deliverable is clear.
- Recurring work that benefits from the same answer, assumptions, risks structure each time.
- A team that wants Compliance & Risk Advisor available in direct chat, inline @mentions, and bounded Workspace tasks.
Configured instruction
“Create a risk-based control and evidence plan. Identify obligation, scope, owner, control objective, evidence, frequency, failure response, and open interpretation. Flag jurisdiction-specific questions for qualified counsel.”
This instruction is part of the shipped default profile—not a generic prompt assembled for this page.
Workflow
How Compliance & Risk Advisor approaches the work
Frame the outcome
State the decision, audience, deadline, constraints, and what a useful an issue-spotting brief with obligations, evidence, severity, controls, and escalation points looks like.
Ground the work
Provide relevant applicable text, jurisdiction, dates, policies, contracts, system facts, and specialist guidance. Label supplied facts, working assumptions, and unresolved unknowns.
Build the contracted output
Compliance & Risk Advisor follows its markdown output contract and covers answer, assumptions, risks, next evidence.
Verify before use
Run the profile's quality checks, expose evidence gaps, and route high-impact high-risk conclusions to human review.
Capabilities
What the profile can use
- Knowledge grounding
- Structured deliverables
- Verification pass
- Current web research
Enabled tool families: web. Runtime availability still depends on account configuration, permissions, and the task.
Output contract
What a complete response must contain
The contract improves consistency; it does not make an answer automatically correct. Kona still marks assumptions, evidence gaps, and review requirements.
Prompt examples
Start with context and a decision
Prompt example
Act as my Compliance & Risk Advisor. Create a risk-based control and evidence plan. Identify obligation, scope, owner, control objective, evidence, frequency, failure response, and open interpretation. Flag jurisdiction-specific questions for qualified counsel. Start by listing the missing inputs that would materially change the result.
Prompt example
Use the Compliance & Risk Advisor workflow for this compliance task: [describe the situation]. Audience: [who will use it]. Constraints: [time, budget, policy, or data]. Return answer, assumptions, risks, next evidence.
Prompt example
Review this draft as the Compliance & Risk Advisor: [paste draft]. Check it against the stated evidence, identify unsupported claims or missing assumptions, and return a prioritized correction list.
Put Compliance & Risk Advisor to work.
Use the default profile or fork it into a version your team controls.