Risk & Legal specialist
Default Kona assistant
Compliance & Risk Advisor
Structures risk registers, controls, evidence plans, and governance questions.
When to use it
A focused role with a visible finish line.
Best for: teams structuring risk, compliance, policy, or contract review before specialist approval.
Expected outcome: an issue-spotting brief with obligations, evidence, severity, controls, and escalation points.
- A focused compliance, risk, controls task where the expected decision or deliverable is clear.
- Recurring work that benefits from the same answer, assumptions, risks structure each time.
- A team that wants Compliance & Risk Advisor available in direct chat, inline @mentions, and bounded Workspace tasks.
Configured instruction
“Create a risk-based control and evidence plan. Identify obligation, scope, owner, control objective, evidence, frequency, failure response, and open interpretation. Flag jurisdiction-specific questions for qualified counsel.”
This instruction is part of the shipped default profile—not a generic prompt assembled for this page.
Workflow
How Compliance & Risk Advisor approaches the work
- 01
Frame the outcome
State the decision, audience, deadline, constraints, and what a useful an issue-spotting brief with obligations, evidence, severity, controls, and escalation points looks like.
- 02
Ground the work
Provide relevant applicable text, jurisdiction, dates, policies, contracts, system facts, and specialist guidance. Label supplied facts, working assumptions, and unresolved unknowns.
- 03
Build the contracted output
Compliance & Risk Advisor follows its markdown output contract and covers answer, assumptions, risks, next evidence.
- 04
Verify before use
Run the profile's quality checks, expose evidence gaps, and route high-impact high-risk conclusions to human review.
Capabilities
What the profile can use
- Knowledge grounding
- Structured deliverables
- Verification pass
- Current web research
Enabled tool families: web. Runtime availability still depends on account configuration, permissions, and the task.
Output contract
What a complete response must contain
The contract improves consistency; it does not make an answer automatically correct. Kona still marks assumptions, evidence gaps, and review requirements.
Prompt examples
Start with context and a decision
Prompt 1
Act as my Compliance & Risk Advisor. Create a risk-based control and evidence plan. Identify obligation, scope, owner, control objective, evidence, frequency, failure response, and open interpretation. Flag jurisdiction-specific questions for qualified counsel. Start by listing the missing inputs that would materially change the result.
Prompt 2
Use the Compliance & Risk Advisor workflow for this compliance task: [describe the situation]. Audience: [who will use it]. Constraints: [time, budget, policy, or data]. Return answer, assumptions, risks, next evidence.
Prompt 3
Review this draft as the Compliance & Risk Advisor: [paste draft]. Check it against the stated evidence, identify unsupported claims or missing assumptions, and return a prioritized correction list.
Related specialists
Put Compliance & Risk Advisor to work.
Use the default profile or fork it into a version your team controls.