01
Source the important claims
We prefer primary documentation, public agencies, recognized research, and clearly identified first-party product information. Article source lists are there so readers can inspect the evidence.
Kona team
Product expertise with an accountable editorial process.
The Kona Team builds the product and publishes the planning guides behind it. This page explains who owns that work, how we review business content, and how to report a correction.
01
Product and workflow documentation
02
Business-planning editorial review
03
Source and correction ownership
Editorial standards
How Kona content is researched and maintained.
Our goal is useful business guidance with enough context for readers to verify claims and adapt assumptions.
02
Separate evidence from judgment
Guides distinguish sourced facts from planning assumptions, examples, and recommendations. Product pages describe workflows users can verify in the product.
03
Update when the page changes
A modified date should reflect a meaningful review or visible content change. Time-sensitive claims are checked again when a guide is revised.
Corrections and contact
Help us keep the record accurate.
If a guide contains an outdated fact, broken source, or product description that no longer matches the experience, email support@konabusiness.ai with the page URL and the correction.